I've realized that life just keeps getting better and better. I've been complaining about my life being monotonous and boring and stuff, but hell, it looks like my suffering has paid off after all. There are still a few dimwitted retards left on fanfiction.net. Honestly, even my genius didn't foresee someone other than the author would retaliate to my flame. I'm sure y'all flamers are familiar with the story 'Lost Bonds' by Rayearthann? Well, I flamed that story and waited and waited for the author to reply. But none came and I forgot about it after a week or so. Today when I was going through my review history page I decided to pay a visit to that story. And guess what? I noticed two new reviews! Both of them were anonymous and quite surprisingly both of them were in retaliation to my review. Well, since they're anonymous it doesn't give me a chance to PM them and hit them with a hurricane of expletives directly. But what the hell, this way everyone'll get to see.
Here's the first:
Somehow, there is still some dimwitted ppl who think that comments and reviews are different. There are readers who leave great reviews and some who leaves comments... so what makes you think that readers can't put their comments in a review... It helps the writers whether it is a good or a bad comment.
Some readers like stories like what i had just read... some may not. There is no reason to talk bad about someone's taste. Just because you hate stories like this doesn't mean you have the right to criticize those that does. You call them shallow minded and i think you are the most shallow minded one of all... cause you can't accept the fact that everyone have different tastes in fictions.
I'm sorry i didn't leave a proper review or comment (for some ppl who doesn't know that a review and comment can be left here)... however, I will like to encourage the writer to keep up her/his work for the better.
Somehow, there is still some dimwitted ppl who think that comments and reviews are different. "there is still some"? When you say 'there is' you're automatically suggesting referral to a singular, but when you say 'some', you negate that 'is' altogether, since, if you didn't know, 'some' refers to a quantity 'more than one', and singular, for your information refers to one. And 'ppl'? Honestly, I hate it when people use internet slang and pretend they're haranguing someone, because internet slang and will never help you make a point. You don't sound convincing at all, you retard, hence there is no need to take you seriously at all. But I'm bored, so what the heck? 'Comments' and 'reviews' are two entirely different things, you enemy of the dictionary! Comments are general remarks and opinions that may or may not be significant, while a review is, while also an opinion, feedback to the author about the story. I can call the author a daughter of a drunken whore if I wanted to, and that would be a comment, not a review. These are also comments: "it was so goood! i loved it!" because it can apply to any effing story and to no one story in particular. Reviews have to backed up with citations or references to the fucking story. Going back to the beginning, what was that Somehow for, huh? You talk like you are a flamer-exterminator or something. Sadly, a person as stupid and retarded as you could hardly stand up to a flamer without wetting their pants. And that kinda explains your anonymity.
so what makes you think that readers can't put their comments in a review...
I'm assuming the elipsis that follows indicates that you refrained from spitting out your effing question completely. But according to basic grammar even that elipsis has to be followed by a question mark or this ? sign. Since it's a QUESTION mark you have to place it after a QUESTION. Don't worry, you'll learn before the sun turns into a red giant, if you're lucky.
It helps the writers whether it is a good or a bad comment.
First up, I'm proud of you for capitalizing that 'I' at the beginning of the sentence. Capitalized letters are sporadic in your review, so good job! Getting back to the nub, this is a comment: "You are a daughter of a drunken whore!" This is a bad comment, and according to you this is going to help the author? I can understand if it helps the author know her roots better, but not otherwise. And 'It helps the writers'? You mean to say that one single good/bad comment is going to help a community of writers? 'It' should have been they, you wannabe smartass.
Some readers like stories like what i had just read... some may not. There is no reason to talk bad about someone's taste. Just because you hate stories like this doesn't mean you have the right to criticize those that does. You call them shallow minded and i think you are the most shallow minded one of all... cause you can't accept the fact that everyone have different tastes in fictions.
Your first sentence makes me want to puke my insides out. So in your opinion you shout out to the fan fiction community, "I had just read this story, you may like it"? That's really very retarded. some may not. Exactly, so you're getting there. You can't expect everyone to enjoy every story, especially if it's as horrendous as the one here. Talk bad about someone's taste? Enlighten me, you bitch. When I have said anything about people's tastes? I called the reviewers who COMMENT uselessly (like this: "ooooooh! i loved the story!!") shallow-minded imbecilic dimwits. I criticized the fact that they COMMENT like that and never have I said anything about their tastes, which I don't give a shit about and would hang myself before I do. You call them shallow minded and i think you are the most shallow minded one of all... That little 'and' over there kind of automatically approves of my calling them shallow-minded (which is spelled with a hyphen, by the way). In which case you're agreeing disagreeing with me AT THE SAME TIME! Pray, make up your mind. And I don't get why you don't ever seem to get the proper use of elipses. Note that I haven't condoned your having called me shallow-minded, because if I were shallow-minded I would have called the author of the fic a daughter of a whore (this is getting redundant, isn't it?) But in my review I actually expanded on my criticsm, which you wouldn't be able to do in a million years. If you're so convinced neither the author nor the reviewers deserved what I said to them then you should back your opinion up. In other words, you should present a reason or reasons for favoring those reviewers, who are only a waste of space, and authors who write shitty-as-hell fics, and I'm sure that a person of your intelligence can hardly even say "Because I say so. cause you can't accept the fact that everyone have different tastes in fictions." Ah, so was the elipsis for this? That's dumb. Anyway, everyone have? Honestly, it's 'has', and I don't know why I'm even bothering to correct you since that's something Divinity gave up on since the time of your birth. And that 'fictions' should have been the generic 'fiction'. Apart from that, for your information, if I couldn't accept the fact that everyone 'have' different tastes in 'fictions' I wouldn't have bothered reading others' stories at all. I would have written like a compulsive prick and read and reread my own stories, stuck in my cocoon of narcissism. But I do believe that people have their own tastes and opinions and that's why I even read other stories. Hell, why else would I have expanded so much on why the author in question is immorally abusing Slam Dunk? There's a difference between having an opinion and doing something bad just because it's good in your opinion.
I'm sorry i didn't leave a proper review or comment (for some ppl who doesn't know that a review and comment can be left here)... however, I will like to encourage the writer to keep up her/his work for the better.
This is killing my brain, but I'll go on anyway. You bet you didn't leave a proper review or comment, because you, unlike me, were retaliating to my review. Your had nothing to do about the story at all, so you're a hipocryte, you know that? Go look it up in the dictionary, because I don't have the patience to tell you what that means. (for some ppl who doesn't know that a review and comment can be left here) I read this line a dozen times and I still couldn't make heads or tails out of it. Are you saying that I'm ignorant of the fact that the REVIEW button is used to post REVIEWS? What do you think I am, googling 'CRAPPY FANFICTIONS AND BITCHY REVIEWERS' and somehow, accidentally, posting irrelevent shit there? If you're trying to make sense at all, I'm sorry to have to point out that your shitty remark fell sizably short of the target. I don't think I can expand on this odious sentence any longer, for fear of being driven insane by its senselessness. however, I will like to encourage the writer to keep his/her work up for the better. First of all, it should be 'WOULD' and not 'WILL'. Secondly, if you haven't noticed, the story is complete, and since that's what 'work', in the singular implied, I'm predisposed to believe that you're even more retarded than I thought when I first read your COMMENT. (Yes, yours is a COMMENT.) Anyway, there's another little point I shall bring up in the end.
And in the meanwhile, the second review. This review didn't wholly refer to me or my review, but all the same, it did. And hence it's here:
The first fiction Take my Word for It is much better than the sequel but i read it anyhow. There is not much fire in Yuiiko than the first fic. I really like the Yuiiko in Take My Word for it. Somehow the sequel is lacking of that the fierce anti social rule breaking Yuiiko.
There are times i like to browse through the review part. I saw some readers flaming this fic. That made me laugh. Yuiiko a mary sue? Hm... it looks like she just read the SEQUEL 1st chapter and assumed it eh... she didn't even read the start of story but read only a tiny little bit of the middle of it and have so much to say. All I can say is that Yuiiko is not anywhere near being a marysue.
Thought I like to point out a few lack of information in the sequel... like Yuiiko was actually a handicap that is why she quit swimming and started singing in her schooling days. But it wasn't mentioned anymore in the sequel. I thought i would like to hear that there was a cure for her disability... and also... because of her handicap wouldn't it be difficult for her to dance? Anyways... i thought it should be pointed out. Maybe it will help you write better in future :) when it come to a continuation of a fiction :) Besides that, you got to improve you grammar and inconsistency of sentences too...
Well, try to keep up your work and make it better
The first paragraph is nonsense, I don't give a shit about what the shitty reviewer's saying. Moving on to the second now.
There are times i like to browse through the review part. I saw some readers flaming this fic. That made me laugh. Yuiiko a mary sue? Hm... it looks like she just read the SEQUEL 1st chapter and assumed it eh... she didn't even read the start of story but read only a tiny little bit of the middle of it and have so much to say. All I can say is that Yuiiko is not anywhere near being a marysue.
There's a missing word 'when' somewhere in the first sentence. Between 'times' and the 'i'. You refer to the generic times, and then in the second sentence you say 'saw', which is the past tense? Miraculous! That made you laugh, did it? Yuiiko a mary sue? ROFL, it's so funny isn't it? "How can Yuiiko be a mary sue?! All she did was incline Rukawa to hump her senseless the first time he set eyes on her? Honestly, I would die to be Yuiiko!" And that's why she doesn't mind Yuiiko's miserable existence in the story. I really can't lay any claims on the existence to Yuiiko humping Rukawa, since I didn't go beyond the first chapter, but for all you know, that could just be the case. After all, Mary Sues are notoriously infamous for stealing Rukawa's virginity more often than not. All I can say is that Yuiiko is not anywhere near being a marysue. Hey, I think I'll use the Theory of Relativity here. Take the number line for example. The positive side depicts an increasing feeling of tolerance towards OCs and the negative, increasing aversion. Mary Sue's are somewhere beyond the ten raised to fifty-thousand range, which is VERY far for us OC and Mary Sue haters, we, being somehwhere in the negative of the same value. But this bitchy reviewer is just a few numbers away from the Paradise of Mary Sues, so naturally, she'll not be able to fathom how 'near' she is from being a 'marysue'. She's already in the Mary Sue zone, if you ask me. For crying out loud, she's an international popstar! What more could you want?
Thought I like to point out a few lack of information in the sequel... like Yuiiko was actually a handicap that is why she quit swimming and started singing in her schooling days. But it wasn't mentioned anymore in the sequel. I thought i would like to hear that there was a cure for her disability... and also... because of her handicap wouldn't it be difficult for her to dance? Anyways... i thought it should be pointed out. Maybe it will help you write better in future :) when it come to a continuation of a fiction :) Besides that, you got to improve you grammar and inconsistency of sentences too...
Well, try to keep up your work and make it better
Well of course she'll have to give a reason why she popped out as a popstar, right? She could have just as well said "She was effing rich and she sang so sweetly that even God's angels wanted her to be theirs", right? And on you go thereafter about how seemingly interesting this shitty story is, and I don't even want to bother reading through that nonsense. Again, this reviewer has molested the usage of elipses. And hell, can you imagine, she tells the author to improve in grammar when her's as bad as a mentally retarded zygote-wallaby's?
And at the end of the day, I'd like to say that nothing gets past me. It's more than suspicious how both reviews turned out only one day apart, much after mine. (Like a week and a half after.) Moreover, they're both anonymous. Both exhibit ignorance about the usage of elipses. Needless to say, not only are these two reviewers one and the same person, but also the same as the author herself! Tada! You wouldn't need to be a Sherlock Holmes to make sense of that.
0 comments :
Post a Comment