I don’t usually like digging up dead and decayed arguments, but I think it’s imperative that I say this, since it acts as proof of what I said two posts earlier in that critical exposition thing of mine. On Facebook I’m part of a group of supporters of Sir Winston Churchill, and I was going through the wall posts today when I came across a disturbing exchange between a psychopathic, uncouth, supremely unintelligent and unaccountably bitter and belligerent Indian who for whatever reason was badmouthing Churchill in a manner that would be deemed childish even by a five-year-old, and an Englishman who had every right to defend Churchill, one of the greatest leaders the world has ever seen. The first question that one would ask is, Why was the bastard sonuvabitch even part of the group if all he wanted to do is spew all kinds of defamatory, malignant and by all means mendacious crap about Churchill? The exiguous amounts of brain-cells that he had in his possession, having probably rented them from one of the older inmates of a badly maintained asylum, would not even equip him with the amount of intelligence necessary to perform half a blink, or so transpired from the kind and quality of his arguments against those of the Englishman. The only argument this ill-advised Indian had with him was a cheap piece of untruth: that Churchill sterilized a hundred thousand degenerates in his own country, possibly for his own amusement. He went on to state rather vehemently that Churchill was as racist as Hitler, and that the scathing remarks he had made against Gandhi reflected this, following which he said that he disagreed with all of Gandhi’s views and didn’t like him much, and that he respected Churchill for who he was! The Englishman rightly pointed out this idiotic self-contradiction, and to cover up for it, this foolish man began blathering about completely unrelated things, topics ranging from the Aborigines of Australia to shit about Indian history, hurling accusations and invectives at the Englishman for being English. What was funny was that the Englishman had an infinitely more credible and sagacious account of Indian history than this retarded flounder.
No one doubts that the British had colonized India for their own gains, exploited Indian resources invidiously, and been inhuman and cruel to Indians on more instances than can be recorded. But that does not negate the benefits that arose from their Rule. The British had abolished many of the horrific and festering practices of Indian society, and made India united when it had been comprised of innumerable, insignificant kingdoms that were continually at war with each other with the contingency of complete annihilation looming ominously overhead. The Indian on Facebook retorted to a similar statement made by the Englishman by saying that the practice of Sati was abolished by Raja Ram Mohan Roy and not the British. Where was Raja Ram Mohan Roy educated, pray tell? During the British rule only those Indians who had studied abroad, in England mainly, had the common sense and foresight necessary to govern the country and know what was best for its people. The rest of them evolved into those apathetic, miserable, impecunious lowlifes that I condemned in my earlier entry.
The obvious conclusion is that, despite all the horrors and cruelty associated with it, the British Rule did more good to India than bad. It emancipated the Indian people from their orthodox ways of thinking and equipped them with the necessary qualities to exist in the present-day world. The inconsistencies of monarchical Indian governance would have been too much for the country, with all its self-important, ignorant people (such as that imbecile on Facebook) to bear, and they would have inevitably and disgracefully perished.
So as anyone can plainly see, Indians are probably the most arrogant group of people in the world. The source of their arrogance? An ambitious and most undoubtedly fictitious account of their achievements and history. They have a warped perception of the world, and take offense for something that wasn’t even directed at them, and are of the opinion that the whole world has perpetrated an unforgivable injustice on them. The facts are laid bare. I think I’m fairly justified in presuming that this subhuman scum (the Indian) is schizophrenic, a victim of child abuse, and the son of several fathers. Pitiful.
0 comments :
Post a Comment